| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
| Syrian
foreign policy - international relations
and conflicts |
 |
|
1. Border conflicts
The Arab states
in the Middle East region seem to
be artificial states in their character
as national states as well as in
the shape of their territory. Indeed,
the most influential causes of interstate
conflicts are controversial borders
and territories and by this the
right of disposal over resources
of central importance like water
and oil. The current borders and
territories were established by
the European colonial powers Great
Britain and France during the First
World War. Especially the state
building in the Middle East had
strong effects towards the division
of traditional economic links and
common cultural heritages, so that
the there-living population does
not have a national identity. Besides
that, the states suffer from strategic
disadvantages and resulting conflicts.
On May 16th 1916, in the British-French-Russian
Sykes-Picot-Agreement Great Britain
and France ensure their influence
zones in the Arab provinces of the
Ottoman Empire. The Sykes-Picot-Agreement
which served as a basis for the
division of the Middle East, stood
contradictory to obligation of the
British against their Arab allies.
For the engagement against the Ottoman
Empire, Great Britain has pledged
the establishment of an independent
Arab empire. But also a second declaration
of intent, the Balfour Declaration
from November 1917, guarantied the
creation of a national homeplace
for the Jews in Palestine.
The territorial conflicts are consequences
of the artificial state establishment
during colonial times and mandate
administration. The ability to survive
for states was not taken into consideration
in a sufficient manner so the borders
are potentially at disposal.
|
 |
|
2. The historical
extension of Syria
By an historical
perspective Syria extends over a
territory on which nowadays four
states are situated: Israel, Jordan,
Lebanon and Syria, additional are
the Gaza stripe and the southern
part of Turkey. Due to the valuable
strategic situation of Syria and
a high cultural standard of the
population, there were always centres
of powers situated.
Since June 23rd 1939, the former
Syrian province Alexandrite became
Turkish. Syria lost harbours and
a connection to Europe. The lost
of Alexandrite is not accepted by
Syria till in the present. The last
territorial change was the occupation
of the Golan Heights by Israel in
the Third Arab-Israeli war.
All regimes after the Syrian independence
requested a right to say in matters
concerning Palestine, Jordan and
Lebanon. So the concept of Great
Syria is of importance in the foreign
policy of Syria.
A special case of foreign policy
is the relation of Syria and the
Lebanon which is basically about
the strategy of Syria pursuant to
the Great Syria Concept to re-include
Lebanon. Four month after the beginning
of the Lebanese civil war (conducted
from 1975 till 1990), the Syrian
armed forces march in the conflict
area. The official reasoning was
to force the fighting religious
groups on the negotiation table.
Assad has got the mandate of the
Arab League and also the approval
of the West to secure the region
and even until today about 35.000
Syrian soldiers stand there.
|
 |
|
3. The Arab-Israeli
conflict
After the proclamation
of Israel, 14.5.1948, the Arab-Israeli
conflict is the most constant and
the deepest conflict in the Middle
East. In the core of the conflict
is the claim of two people on the
same territory. The establishment
of a non-Arab state in the center
of the Arab world is not acceptable
from the perspective of Islamic
and Panarab ideals, the importance
of the disputed region was enhanced
by the religious places there (for
Muslims, Jerusalem is the third
holiest place after Mecca and Medina).
Israel is a symbol for the Arabs.
Its existence shows the artificial
and arbitrary state building in
the Middle East. The Balfour Declaration
was perceived as a political development
against Arab interests (against
the obligation to the Arab allies
in the war against the Ottoman Empire).
The partition plan of the UN (GA/Res/181)
and the till today lasting support
of the West, especially of the USA,
for Israel illustrates the inability
of the Arabs to stop or change the
process of the foreign dominance
in the Middle East region.
|
 |
|
4. Relations
to other Arab states
Syria and the
Mullah Regime in Iran have contradictory
ideologies, but they do not fight
against each other. According to
the teachings of Khomeini, only
Islamic scholars are able to interpret
the "will of God" from the Koran
and the Sharia to establish a truly
Islamic state. By their ability
to recognize the order willed by
God, Islamic scholar have to govern
the countries, secular politicians
must not take these positions.
At the beginning of the 1980s, the
Iraqi leader Sadam Hussein was strongly
supported by western weapon supplies
and became an existential threat
to the Mullah Regime in Iran. During
the same year an alliance between
Syria and Iran was achieved, because
Assad saw it as a serious possibility
that Iraq would get more powerful
after a victory over Iran. So Syria
became a transit country for weapon
supplies from the Mediterranean
Sea harbours by plane to Iran. The
different ideologies did not matter
any more.
In 1997, the Iraq and Syria started
to re-establish the first mutual
diplomatic relationships after 1980
that included the reopening of border
crossing-points and the encouragement
of bilateral trade. The immediate
cause was an agreement between Turkey
and Israel about military and economic
cooperation in 1996.
Between Syria and Turkey are tensions
about the course of the northern
border, because Syria claims its
former province Alexandrite with
the cities Antiochus and Iscenderun.
Another reason for tensions with
Turkey and common interests of Iraq
and Syria, according to the water
conflict point, is the construction
of huge dams in South-East Anatolia
which will cause droughts in huge
parts of the Near East. So water
is used as a political weapon by
a militarily strong Turkey to set
Iraq and Syria under pressure.
|
 |
|
5. Relations
to the superpowers
The USA supports
Israel and on the other side radical
Arab states, the PLO and the Soviet
Union stood in confrontation against
the American-Israeli coalition.
Comprehensive weapon supplies have
signed the American special relations
to Israel. But also there exists
a special diplomatic relation, the
USA stops always sanctions against
Israel in the frame of the UN.
Soviet Union provides economic and
military help for Syria, till today
Syria owes 15 billion US-Dollars
resulting from military help initiatives.
Nowadays, the relations to the United
States on a diplomatic level are
minimal with only few bilateral
meetings. Syria is on the American
list of state sponsors of terrorism.
After the incidence of September
11th, Syria and other countries
of the Arab League condemn the attacks
on the United States and expressed
their sympathy with the victims.
France, the former colonial power,
has even in the present close ties
with Syria. Officially the French
government encourages the current
modernization processes in Syria
and supports an association agreement
between Syria and the European Union.
France is the most important import
and the third largest export partner
of Syria. But there are also close
bilateral relations in cultural
and academic fields.
|
 |
| Syria
and the United Nations |
 |
|
"I would
like to assure you that Syria should
remain, as it has always been, in
the forefront of those who defend
international legitimacy and the
Charter of the United Nations and
will exert every possible effort
during its membership of the Security
Council to contribute to preserving
international peace and security."
Farouk
Al-Shara
|
 |
Syria is one of
the founding members of the United
Nations and therefore is member since
the 24th of October 1945. It has been
voted into the Security Council mainly
backed by the Arab world and Asia
and thus will take part as a non-permanent
member for the term starting at the
1st of January 2002 up to the 31st
of December 2003.
The Syrian delegations usually not
only appear to act resolute and self-confident
but also sharp or even harsh. The
United Nations are a hardwearing instrument
and platform with which also collisions
are accepted when important issues
are concerned. There are open and
direct confrontations with Israel
and, coming along with it, the United
States of America which often vote
in accordance with Israel on the Middle
East issues.
The foremost goal of the Syrian Arab
Republic is to use the United Nations
for putting an end to the aggressive
policy, which is pursued by Israel.
The "terrorist state of Israel" is
to withdraw from all occupied territories,
restoring the Syrian Golan as it has
been before June 4th 1967, and to
meet its obligations especially to
finally implement the relevant resolutions.
One of the Israeli occupied territories
is South Lebanon. In 2000 Israel finally
withdrew from South Lebanon according
to SC resolutions 425 and 426 but
still some minor ground violations
occur. The United Nations Interim
Force in Lebanon has been established
through Security Council resolutions
425 and 426 to confirm the withdrawal
of Israeli forces from all Lebanese
territory, to restore international
peace and security and to assist the
government in ensuring the return
of its effective authority in the
area.
Furthermore, the United Nations Disengagement
Observer Force maintains an area of
separation with about 80 km of length
and varies in width between 10 km
in the centre and 1 km in the extreme
south. UNDOF will intervene whenever
any military personnel try to enter
or operate within the territory. The
situation between Syria and Israel
remained quiet though it is still
the fact that Israel holds land in
the Golan Heights. In fact, Israel
seized over 90% land of the Golan
bringing along the destruction of
numerous towns and expelling over
130,000 Syrians.
Considering the importance of the
issue of terrorism it is remarkable
that Syria was the first country to
call in 1985 for convening an international
conference under the auspices of the
United Nations that defines terrorism
and differentiates it from the struggle
of peoples for national liberation.
A resolution in the GA was adopted
against international terrorism and
measures on eliminating international
terrorism by a vote of 131 in favor,
none against and two abstentions from
Syria and Lebanon. In the explanation
of its vote the Syrian delegation
condemned all forms and manifestations
of terrorism but the draft submitted
did not take into account Syria's
main concerns namely the distinction
between terrorism and the legitimate
struggle against foreign occupation.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
© 2003
Magdeburg Model United Nations |
|
|
|
|
|